Characteristics, Challenges and Analysis of Newly Constructed Hill Buildings in India: A Review
Dharmendra Kushwaha, Neeraj Kumar, Saraswati Setia
Abstract
This paper examines the complexities involved in designing buildings located in hilly regions in India, which face
unique challenges due to their topography and susceptibility to earthquakes. Although structural engineers can
develop earthquake-resistant buildings, significant gaps remain in assessing seismic risks specific to hillside
structures, including issues related to slope stability, soil-structure interaction, and landslide hazards. The primary
focus of this study is to explore the characteristics, challenges, design and analysis techniques, and current code
regulations for hill buildings. Nowadays, advanced analysis and modeling software are employed to evaluate how
structures on slopes behave under seismic forces. The study underscores the necessity for specialized design
guidelines, architectural criteria, and the application of sophisticated dynamic analysis methods to tackle the
challenges posed by hilly terrains. It is noted that existing regulations and conventional design practices do not
adequately account for the geological complexities of hillside locations. The insights gained from this research
aim to improve the understanding of how buildings respond during earthquakes and strengthen their ability to
withstand future seismic events. Additionally, the study offers recommendations for engineers and policymakers
to adopt tailored approaches in the design and construction of earthquake-vulnerable hill buildings.
References
1. A. Bahuguna and M. Firoj; Numerical Simulation of Seismic Response of Slope–Foundation–Structure
Interaction for Mid–rise RC Buildings at Various Locations. Structures, 44, 343-356 (2022).
2. A.K. Chopra; Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Pearson, (1995).
3. A. Kumar; Approach to Formulate Setback Regulations for Indian Hill Towns. International Journal of
Sustainable Built Environment, 4(1), 91-99 (2015).
4. A. Kumar; Building Regulations for Environmental Protection in Indian Hill Towns. International Journal
of Sustainable Built Environment, 2(2), 224-231 (2013).
5. A. Kumar; Building Regulations Related to Energy and Water in Indian Hill Towns. Journal of Sustainable
Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 5(4), 496-508 (2017).
6. A. Kumar; Problems and Prospects of Building Regulations in Shimla, India–A Step Towards Achieving
Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 207-215 (2017).
7. A. Kumar and R. Raj; Study of Pressure Distribution on an Irregular Octagonal Plan Oval-shape Building
Using CFD. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(10), 1787-1805 (2021).
8. A. Kumar; Review of Building Regulations for Safety against Hazards in Indian Hill Towns. Journal of
Urban Management, 7(2), 97-110 (2018).
9. A. Olanrewaju and H.J.A. Lee; Analysis of the Poor-quality in Building Elements: Providers' Perspectives.
Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 2(2), 81-94 (2022).
10. A.V. Narayanan; R. Goswami and C.V.R. Murty; Performance of RC Buildings along Hill Slopes of
Himalayas During 2011 Sikkim Earthquake. EERI Newsletter, EERI Special Earthquake Report, 1-14
(2012).
11. P. Agrawal and M. Shrikhande; Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, (2006).
12. ASCE; Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, (2007).
13. ATC; Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-frame
Buildings (Vol. 351), Federal Emergency Management Agency, (2000).
14. B.S.S. Council; Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Report FEMA-
356, Washington, DC (2000)
15. B.I. Standards; Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and
Buildings (5th Ed.), BIS, (2016).
16. B.I. Standards; Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures IS 1893 (Part 1), BIS (2002).
17. B.K. Rastogi; Nepal Earthquake of 2015. Springer, (2024).
18. D. Kushwaha; N. Kumar; S. Setia and P. Lohchab; (2023) Seismic Performance Assessment of RC Hill
Buildings Considering Strong Column and Weak Beam Design. In: Goel, M.D., Gupta, L.M., Jaiswal, O.R.
(eds) Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, Volume 3. SEC 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil
Engineering, vol 548. Springer, Singapore, pp. 309-320.
19. D. Kushwaha; N. Kumar; H.A. Nabum and P. Lohchab; (2022) Seismic Analysis of G+ 2 RC Building
Located in Plain Ground and Sloping Ground. In: Kumar, M., Kumar, P., Anand, S., Verma, N.K., Tripathi,
D.K. (eds) Geographical Dimensions of Environmental Sustainability. IGUTC 2022. Advances in
Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore, pp. 66-75.
20. D. Vamvatsikos and C.A. Cornell; Applied Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 523-
553 (2004).
21. D. Vamvatsikos and C.A. Cornell; Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural
Dynamics. 31(3), 491-514 (2002).
22. E.V. Valmundsson and J.M. Nau; Seismic Response of Building Frames with Vertical Structural
Irregularities. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(1), 30-41 (1997).
23. F. Charney; A New Linear Response History Analysis Procedure for the 2015 NEHRP Recommended
Provisions and For ASCE 7-16, In Structures Congress 2015, pp. 2467-2482 (2015).
24. F. De-Luca and L. Lombardi (2017); EC8 Design through Linear Time History Analysis versus Response
Spectrum Analysis-is it an Enhancement for PBEE. In 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,
16WCEE 2017, Santiago, Chile, p. 1155.
25. H.E. Estekanchi; V. Valamanesh and A. Vafai; Application of Endurance Time Method in Linear Seismic
Analysis. Engineering Structures, 29(10), 2551-2562 (2007).
26. M.K. Kulariya and S.K. Saha; Multi-hazard Performance Evaluation of Hillside Buildings under
Earthquakes and Landslides. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and
Buildings, 177(2), 118-133 (2024).
27. M.M. Ahmed; S.E. Abdel Raheem; M.M. Ahmed and A.G.A. Shafy; Irregularity Effects on the Seismic
Performance of L-shaped Multi-story Buildings. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 44(5), 513-536 (2016).
28. N.B. Code; National Building Code of India. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, BIS, (2016).
29. N. Kumar; D. Kushwaha; M.C. Maurya and R.K. Sharma; Comparative Study of Equivalent Lateral Force
Method and Response Spectrum Method for OMRF Multistory Building–A Review Paper. International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(7), 1066-1073 (2018).
30. P.D. Choudhury and D. Raj (2022); A Critical Review of Existing Building Regulations and Bye-Laws in
Hilly Regions of India. In: Shrikhande, M., Agarwal, P., Kumar, P.C.A. (eds) Proceedings of 17th
Symposium on Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 4). SEE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol 332.
Springer, Singapore, pp. 545-561.
31. P. Garg and H. Kaur; (2019) Sustainability Issues in Context of Indian Hill Towns. In: Littlewood, J.,
Howlett, R., Capozzoli, A., Jain, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems
and Technologies, Vol 163. Springer, Singapore, pp. 629-639.
32. P. Ramancharla; S. Goud; A. Bhalkikar and N. Patnala; Earthquake Disaster Risk Index Report. 50 Towns
& 1 District in Seismic Zones III, IV and V, (2019).
33. P. Roshan and S. Pal; Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Hillside Step-Back RC Buildings Incorporating
Soil-Structure Interaction. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 13(1), p. 83 (2025).
34. P. Roshan and S. Pal; Seismic Safety of Buildings on Indian Hill Slopes—A Review. Recent Advances in
Earthquake Engineering: Select Proceedings of VCDRR 2021, pp.197-209 (2021).
35. P. Roshan and S. Pal; Structural Challenges for Seismic Stability of Buildings in Hilly Areas. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 30(44), 99100-99126 (2023).
36. P.K. Das; S.C. Dutta and T.K. Datta; Seismic Behavior of Plan and Vertically Irregular Structures: State of
Art and Future Challenges. Natural Hazards Review, 22(2) p. 04020062 (2021).
37. R. Imsong and A. Kumar; Building Regulations for North Eastern Region of India. Bhutan Journal of
Research and Development, 2, 1-25 (2023).
38. R. Jarapala and A. Menon; Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings on Hill Slopes: A
Review. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 104(3), 721-745 (2023).
39. S. Chanda; N. Kumar and D. Kushwaha (2023); Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI): A Parameter to Assess
Liquefaction Hazard, In Geohazards: Analysis, Modelling and Forecasting, Singapore: Springer Nature
Singapore., pp. 103-112.
40. S.K. Duggal; Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Vol. 10, New Delhi: Oxford University Press,
(2007).
41. S. Magapu and S. Setia; Fragility Curves for Assessment of Seismic Vulnerability of Buildings on
Slopes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173, p.108069 (2023).
42. S. Rajkumari; K. Thakkar and H. Goyal; Fragility Analysis of Structures Subjected to Seismic Excitation: A
State-of-the-art Review. Structures, 40, 303-316 (2022).
43. S.E.A. Raheem; A. Youssry; M.H. Soghier; M.Y. Fooly and Y.A. Gamal; Evaluation of Seismic Demands
for Adjacent Irregular Buildings with Transverse Alignment Eccentricity. Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering, 23(1), 301-326 (2025).
44. V. Chawhan and M.A. Kamal; A Study of Planning, Design and Construction of Buildings in Hilly Regions
of India. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(1), 13-22 (2021).
45. V.V. Bertero; Strength and Deformation Capacities of Buildings under Extreme Environments. Structural
Engineering and Structural Mechanics, 53(1), 29-79 (1977).
46. Y. Zhang; J.F. Fung; K.J. Johnson and S. Sattar; Review of Seismic Risk Mitigation Policies in Earthquake-
prone Countries: Lessons for Earthquake Resilience in the United States. Journal of Earthquake
Engineering, 26(12), 6208-6235 (2022).
Trion Studio
